Minnesota's Senator Klobuchar has co-sponsored a bill to criminalize certain behavior by peer-to-peer file sharing programs.
The bill is supposed to require a sort of informed consent by computer owners whenever a P2P file sharing program arrives. Here's what the bill wants to require:
• Ensures that P2P file sharing programs cannot be installed without providing clear notice and obtaining informed consent of the authorized computer user.
• Makes it unlawful to prevent the authorized user of a computer from:
1. Blocking the installation of a peer-to-peer file sharing program, and/or
2. Disabling or removing any peer-to-peer file sharing program.
Having taught several networking courses (not to mention having written
my share of networking software), I'm not sure where they can draw the line. What constitutes 'clear notice,' and does that include such things as Windows and Apple file sharing? Do these OS vendors already comply with planned legislative requirements, or will they have to update their configuration software?
Does "Microsoft Genuine Advantage" violate the law if it won't let the computer owner block its communication with the Mother Ship in Redmond? If so, how does Microsoft check for people using the same license on two or more computers?